1951 Maserati A6G vs. 2008 Volvo XC70
To start off, 2008 Volvo XC70 is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Maserati A6G. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Maserati A6G would be higher. At 2,521 cc (5 cylinders), 2008 Volvo XC70 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Volvo XC70 (208 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 108 more horse power than 1951 Maserati A6G. (100 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Volvo XC70 should accelerate faster than 1951 Maserati A6G. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Volvo XC70 weights approximately 530 kg more than 1951 Maserati A6G. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2008 Volvo XC70 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1951 Maserati A6G. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Volvo XC70 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1951 Maserati A6G | 2008 Volvo XC70 | |
| Make | Maserati | Volvo |
| Model | A6G | XC70 |
| Year Released | 1951 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1953 cc | 2521 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 100 HP | 208 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 1630 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2770 mm |
