1951 Maserati A6G vs. 2009 Mazda 3
To start off, 2009 Mazda 3 is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Maserati A6G. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Maserati A6G would be higher. At 2,260 cc, 2009 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda 3 (154 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 1951 Maserati A6G. (129 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1951 Maserati A6G. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda 3 weights approximately 505 kg more than 1951 Maserati A6G. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1951 Maserati A6G is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1951 Maserati A6G. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1951 Maserati A6G | 2009 Mazda 3 | |
Make | Maserati | Mazda |
Model | A6G | 3 |
Year Released | 1951 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1978 cc | 2260 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 129 HP | 154 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 620 kg | 1125 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2320 mm | 2650 mm |