1951 Mercedes-Benz 220 vs. 1960 Toyota Master RR
To start off, 1960 Toyota Master RR is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Mercedes-Benz 220. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Mercedes-Benz 220 would be higher. At 2,195 cc (6 cylinders), 1951 Mercedes-Benz 220 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1951 Mercedes-Benz 220 (78 HP) has 38 more horse power than 1960 Toyota Master RR. (40 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1951 Mercedes-Benz 220 should accelerate faster than 1960 Toyota Master RR.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1951 Mercedes-Benz 220 | 1960 Toyota Master RR | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Toyota |
Model | 220 | Master RR |
Year Released | 1951 | 1960 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2195 cc | 1453 cc |
Horse Power | 78 HP | 40 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4520 mm | 4280 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1620 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 2540 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 48 L | 75 L |