1951 Mercedes-Benz 220 vs. 1964 Renault Dauphine
To start off, 1964 Renault Dauphine is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Mercedes-Benz 220. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Mercedes-Benz 220 would be higher. At 2,195 cc (6 cylinders), 1951 Mercedes-Benz 220 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1951 Mercedes-Benz 220 (78 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 40 more horse power than 1964 Renault Dauphine. (38 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1951 Mercedes-Benz 220 should accelerate faster than 1964 Renault Dauphine.
Let's talk about torque, 1951 Mercedes-Benz 220 (142 Nm) has 85 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Renault Dauphine. (57 Nm). This means 1951 Mercedes-Benz 220 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Renault Dauphine.
Compare all specifications:
| 1951 Mercedes-Benz 220 | 1964 Renault Dauphine | |
| Make | Mercedes-Benz | Renault |
| Model | 220 | Dauphine |
| Year Released | 1951 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2195 cc | 845 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 78 HP | 38 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 142 Nm | 57 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 80 mm | 58 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 72.8 mm | 80 mm |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 3950 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1530 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1570 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 2280 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 48 L | 38 L |
