1951 Mercedes-Benz 220 vs. 1964 Sunbeam Tiger
To start off, 1964 Sunbeam Tiger is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Mercedes-Benz 220. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Mercedes-Benz 220 would be higher. At 4,261 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Sunbeam Tiger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Sunbeam Tiger (163 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 85 more horse power than 1951 Mercedes-Benz 220. (78 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1964 Sunbeam Tiger should accelerate faster than 1951 Mercedes-Benz 220.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1951 Mercedes-Benz 220 | 1964 Sunbeam Tiger | |
| Make | Mercedes-Benz | Sunbeam |
| Model | 220 | Tiger |
| Year Released | 1951 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2195 cc | 4261 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 78 HP | 163 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4520 mm | 3970 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1570 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1620 mm | 1310 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 2190 mm |
