1951 Mercedes-Benz 220 vs. 1971 Opel Ascona
To start off, 1971 Opel Ascona is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Mercedes-Benz 220. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Mercedes-Benz 220 would be higher. At 2,195 cc (6 cylinders), 1951 Mercedes-Benz 220 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1951 Mercedes-Benz 220 (78 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 19 more horse power than 1971 Opel Ascona. (59 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1951 Mercedes-Benz 220 should accelerate faster than 1971 Opel Ascona.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1951 Mercedes-Benz 220 (142 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 52 more torque (in Nm) than 1971 Opel Ascona. (90 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1951 Mercedes-Benz 220 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1971 Opel Ascona.
Compare all specifications:
1951 Mercedes-Benz 220 | 1971 Opel Ascona | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Opel |
Model | 220 | Ascona |
Year Released | 1951 | 1971 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2195 cc | 1196 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 78 HP | 59 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 142 Nm | 90 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 80 mm | 79.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 72.8 mm | 61 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 4140 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1640 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1570 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 2440 mm |