1951 Mercedes-Benz 220 vs. 1974 Toyota Celica
To start off, 1974 Toyota Celica is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Mercedes-Benz 220. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Mercedes-Benz 220 would be higher. At 2,195 cc (6 cylinders), 1951 Mercedes-Benz 220 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1974 Toyota Celica (85 HP) has 7 more horse power than 1951 Mercedes-Benz 220. (78 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1974 Toyota Celica should accelerate faster than 1951 Mercedes-Benz 220.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, both vehicles can yield 142 Nm of torque. So under normal driving conditions, the ability to climb up hills and pull heavy equipment should be relatively similar for both vehicles.
Compare all specifications:
| 1951 Mercedes-Benz 220 | 1974 Toyota Celica | |
| Make | Mercedes-Benz | Toyota |
| Model | 220 | Celica |
| Year Released | 1951 | 1974 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2195 cc | 1588 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 78 HP | 85 HP |
| Torque | 142 Nm | 142 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 4220 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1570 mm | 1300 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 2430 mm |
