1951 Mercedes-Benz 220 vs. 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Mercedes-Benz 220. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Mercedes-Benz 220 would be higher. At 2,260 cc (4 cylinders), 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1951 Mercedes-Benz 220 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1951 Mercedes-Benz 220. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1951 Mercedes-Benz 220 | 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Oldsmobile |
Model | 220 | Cutlass |
Year Released | 1951 | 1981 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2195 cc | 2260 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 78 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4520 mm | 4850 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 2680 mm |