1951 Mercedes-Benz 220 vs. 1990 Volvo 960
To start off, 1990 Volvo 960 is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Mercedes-Benz 220. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Mercedes-Benz 220 would be higher. At 2,383 cc (6 cylinders), 1990 Volvo 960 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Volvo 960 (120 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 42 more horse power than 1951 Mercedes-Benz 220. (78 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1990 Volvo 960 should accelerate faster than 1951 Mercedes-Benz 220.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1990 Volvo 960 (143 Nm) has 1 more torque (in Nm) than 1951 Mercedes-Benz 220. (142 Nm). This means 1990 Volvo 960 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1951 Mercedes-Benz 220.
Compare all specifications:
1951 Mercedes-Benz 220 | 1990 Volvo 960 | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Volvo |
Model | 220 | 960 |
Year Released | 1951 | 1990 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2195 cc | 2383 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 78 HP | 120 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 142 Nm | 143 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 80 mm | 76.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 72.8 mm | 86.4 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 4880 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1570 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 2780 mm |