1951 Mercedes-Benz 220 vs. 1991 Skoda L
To start off, 1991 Skoda L is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Mercedes-Benz 220. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Mercedes-Benz 220 would be higher. At 2,195 cc (6 cylinders), 1951 Mercedes-Benz 220 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1951 Mercedes-Benz 220 (78 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 21 more horse power than 1991 Skoda L. (57 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1951 Mercedes-Benz 220 should accelerate faster than 1991 Skoda L.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1951 Mercedes-Benz 220 (142 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 52 more torque (in Nm) than 1991 Skoda L. (90 Nm @ 3250 RPM). This means 1951 Mercedes-Benz 220 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1991 Skoda L.
Compare all specifications:
1951 Mercedes-Benz 220 | 1991 Skoda L | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Skoda |
Model | 220 | L |
Year Released | 1951 | 1991 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 2195 cc | 1221 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 78 HP | 57 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 142 Nm | 90 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3250 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 80 mm | 72 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 72.8 mm | 72 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 6.5:1 | 9.5:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4520 mm | 4170 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1620 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 2410 mm |