1951 Mercedes-Benz 220 vs. 2009 Acura CSX
To start off, 2009 Acura CSX is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Mercedes-Benz 220. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Mercedes-Benz 220 would be higher. At 2,195 cc (6 cylinders), 1951 Mercedes-Benz 220 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Acura CSX (197 HP) has 119 more horse power than 1951 Mercedes-Benz 220. (78 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Acura CSX should accelerate faster than 1951 Mercedes-Benz 220.
Because 1951 Mercedes-Benz 220 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1951 Mercedes-Benz 220. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Acura CSX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1951 Mercedes-Benz 220 | 2009 Acura CSX | |
| Make | Mercedes-Benz | Acura |
| Model | 220 | CSX |
| Year Released | 1951 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2195 cc | 2000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 78 HP | 197 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4520 mm | 4544 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1752 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1620 mm | 1435 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 2700 mm |
