1951 Mercedes-Benz 220 vs. 2009 Holden Cruze
To start off, 2009 Holden Cruze is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Mercedes-Benz 220. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Mercedes-Benz 220 would be higher. At 2,195 cc (6 cylinders), 1951 Mercedes-Benz 220 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Holden Cruze (148 HP) has 70 more horse power than 1951 Mercedes-Benz 220. (78 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Holden Cruze should accelerate faster than 1951 Mercedes-Benz 220.
Because 1951 Mercedes-Benz 220 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1951 Mercedes-Benz 220. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Holden Cruze, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Holden Cruze (320 Nm) has 178 more torque (in Nm) than 1951 Mercedes-Benz 220. (142 Nm). This means 2009 Holden Cruze will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1951 Mercedes-Benz 220.
Compare all specifications:
1951 Mercedes-Benz 220 | 2009 Holden Cruze | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Holden |
Model | 220 | Cruze |
Year Released | 1951 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2195 cc | 1991 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 78 HP | 148 HP |
Torque | 142 Nm | 320 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4520 mm | 4597 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1788 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1620 mm | 1477 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 2685 mm |