1951 Mercedes-Benz 300S vs. 2004 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2004 Ford Ecosport is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Mercedes-Benz 300S. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Mercedes-Benz 300S would be higher. At 2,996 cc (6 cylinders), 1951 Mercedes-Benz 300S is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1951 Mercedes-Benz 300S (148 HP) has 81 more horse power than 2004 Ford Ecosport. (67 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1951 Mercedes-Benz 300S should accelerate faster than 2004 Ford Ecosport.
Because 1951 Mercedes-Benz 300S is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1951 Mercedes-Benz 300S. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Ford Ecosport, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1951 Mercedes-Benz 300S | 2004 Ford Ecosport | |
| Make | Mercedes-Benz | Ford |
| Model | 300S | Ecosport |
| Year Released | 1951 | 2004 |
| Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2996 cc | 1400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 148 HP | 67 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 4228 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1920 mm | 1980 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1679 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 2490 mm |
