1951 MG YB vs. 2012 Audi TT
To start off, 2012 Audi TT is newer by 61 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 MG YB. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 MG YB would be higher. At 1,800 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Audi TT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Audi TT (158 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 113 more horse power than 1951 MG YB. (45 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1951 MG YB.
Because 1951 MG YB is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1951 MG YB. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Audi TT, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Audi TT (250 Nm @ 1500 RPM) has 171 more torque (in Nm) than 1951 MG YB. (79 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2012 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1951 MG YB.
Compare all specifications:
1951 MG YB | 2012 Audi TT | |
Make | MG | Audi |
Model | YB | TT |
Year Released | 1951 | 2012 |
Engine Size | 1250 cc | 1800 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 45 HP | 158 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 79 Nm | 250 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 1500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4170 mm | 4201 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1510 mm | 1842 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1359 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2469 mm |