1951 Morris Minor vs. 1996 Oldsmobile SS
To start off, 1996 Oldsmobile SS is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Morris Minor. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Morris Minor would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Oldsmobile SS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Oldsmobile SS (238 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 211 more horse power than 1951 Morris Minor. (27 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Oldsmobile SS should accelerate faster than 1951 Morris Minor.
Because 1951 Morris Minor is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1951 Morris Minor. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Oldsmobile SS, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Oldsmobile SS (380 Nm) has 327 more torque (in Nm) than 1951 Morris Minor. (53 Nm). This means 1996 Oldsmobile SS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1951 Morris Minor.
Compare all specifications:
| 1951 Morris Minor | 1996 Oldsmobile SS | |
| Make | Morris | Oldsmobile |
| Model | Minor | SS |
| Year Released | 1951 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 918 cc | 3791 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 27 HP | 238 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 53 Nm | 380 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Length | 3770 mm | 5130 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1900 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2190 mm | 2820 mm |
