1951 Porsche 356 vs. 2005 Volkswagen Polo
To start off, 2005 Volkswagen Polo is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Porsche 356. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Porsche 356 would be higher. At 1,390 cc, 2005 Volkswagen Polo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Volkswagen Polo (83 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 45 more horse power than 1951 Porsche 356. (38 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Volkswagen Polo should accelerate faster than 1951 Porsche 356. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Volkswagen Polo weights approximately 329 kg more than 1951 Porsche 356. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1951 Porsche 356 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1951 Porsche 356. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Volkswagen Polo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1951 Porsche 356 | 2005 Volkswagen Polo | |
| Make | Porsche | Volkswagen |
| Model | 356 | Polo |
| Year Released | 1951 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1131 cc | 1390 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 38 HP | 83 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 780 kg | 1109 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 2470 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 45 L |
