1951 Porsche 356 vs. 2006 Renault Clio
To start off, 2006 Renault Clio is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Porsche 356. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Porsche 356 would be higher. At 1,390 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Renault Clio weights approximately 200 kg more than 1951 Porsche 356.
Because 1951 Porsche 356 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1951 Porsche 356. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1951 Porsche 356 | 2006 Renault Clio | |
Make | Porsche | Renault |
Model | 356 | Clio |
Year Released | 1951 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1287 cc | 1390 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 97 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 830 kg | 1030 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3870 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 990 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 2690 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 50 L |