1951 Porsche 356 vs. 2010 Renault Megane
To start off, 2010 Renault Megane is newer by 59 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Porsche 356. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Porsche 356 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Renault Megane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Renault Megane (227 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 189 more horse power than 1951 Porsche 356. (38 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Renault Megane should accelerate faster than 1951 Porsche 356.
Because 1951 Porsche 356 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1951 Porsche 356. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Renault Megane, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1951 Porsche 356 | 2010 Renault Megane | |
Make | Porsche | Renault |
Model | 356 | Megane |
Year Released | 1951 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1131 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 38 HP | 227 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3960 mm | 4220 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2110 mm | 2630 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 60 L |