1951 Renault Juva vs. 1996 Rover 400
To start off, 1996 Rover 400 is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Renault Juva. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Renault Juva would be higher. At 1,589 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Rover 400 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1951 Renault Juva is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1951 Renault Juva. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Rover 400, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1951 Renault Juva | 1996 Rover 400 | |
Make | Renault | Rover |
Model | Juva | 400 |
Year Released | 1951 | 1996 |
Engine Size | 1003 cc | 1589 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 109 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3760 mm | 4370 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1410 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1620 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2560 mm |