1951 Renault Juva vs. 2013 Volvo XC60
To start off, 2013 Volvo XC60 is newer by 62 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Renault Juva. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Renault Juva would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Volvo XC60 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Volvo XC60 weights approximately 1108 kg more than 1951 Renault Juva.
Because 2013 Volvo XC60 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1951 Renault Juva. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Volvo XC60 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1951 Renault Juva | 2013 Volvo XC60 | |
Make | Renault | Volvo |
Model | Juva | XC60 |
Year Released | 1951 | 2013 |
Engine Size | 1003 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 6 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 321 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 810 kg | 1918 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3760 mm | 4627 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1410 mm | 1891 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1620 mm | 1713 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2774 mm |