1951 Riley RM A vs. 1984 Volvo 740
To start off, 1984 Volvo 740 is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Riley RM A would be higher. At 2,316 cc (4 cylinders), 1984 Volvo 740 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1984 Volvo 740 weights approximately 80 kg more than 1951 Riley RM A.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1951 Riley RM A | 1984 Volvo 740 | |
Make | Riley | Volvo |
Model | RM A | 740 |
Year Released | 1951 | 1984 |
Engine Size | 1495 cc | 2316 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 115 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1235 kg | 1315 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 2780 mm |