1951 Riley RM A vs. 1990 Toyota Lite Ace
To start off, 1990 Toyota Lite Ace is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Riley RM A would be higher. At 1,495 cc (4 cylinders), 1951 Riley RM A is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1951 Riley RM A weights approximately 131 kg more than 1990 Toyota Lite Ace.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1951 Riley RM A | 1990 Toyota Lite Ace | |
| Make | Riley | Toyota |
| Model | RM A | Lite Ace |
| Year Released | 1951 | 1990 |
| Engine Size | 1495 cc | 1453 cc |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1235 kg | 1104 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4010 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1910 mm |
