1951 Riley RM A vs. 1992 Holden Nova
To start off, 1992 Holden Nova is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Riley RM A would be higher. At 1,495 cc (4 cylinders), 1951 Riley RM A is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1951 Riley RM A weights approximately 220 kg more than 1992 Holden Nova.
Because 1951 Riley RM A is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1951 Riley RM A. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Holden Nova, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1992 Holden Nova has automatic transmission and 1951 Riley RM A has manual transmission. 1951 Riley RM A will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1992 Holden Nova will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1951 Riley RM A | 1992 Holden Nova | |
Make | Riley | Holden |
Model | RM A | Nova |
Year Released | 1951 | 1992 |
Engine Size | 1495 cc | 1397 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 81 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1235 kg | 1015 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 2440 mm |