1951 Riley RM A vs. 2001 Seat Toledo
To start off, 2001 Seat Toledo is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Riley RM A would be higher. At 2,327 cc, 2001 Seat Toledo is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Seat Toledo weights approximately 151 kg more than 1951 Riley RM A.
Because 1951 Riley RM A is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1951 Riley RM A. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Seat Toledo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1951 Riley RM A | 2001 Seat Toledo | |
| Make | Riley | Seat |
| Model | RM A | Toledo |
| Year Released | 1951 | 2001 |
| Engine Size | 1495 cc | 2327 cc |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 168 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1235 kg | 1386 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4450 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1750 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 2450 mm |
