1951 Riley RM A vs. 2002 Seat Leon
To start off, 2002 Seat Leon is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Riley RM A would be higher. At 1,781 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Seat Leon is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Seat Leon weights approximately 161 kg more than 1951 Riley RM A.
Because 2002 Seat Leon is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1951 Riley RM A. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Seat Leon will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1951 Riley RM A | 2002 Seat Leon | |
| Make | Riley | Seat |
| Model | RM A | Leon |
| Year Released | 1951 | 2002 |
| Engine Size | 1495 cc | 1781 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 178 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1235 kg | 1396 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4190 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1750 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 2520 mm |
