1951 Riley RM A vs. 2004 Alfa Romeo 166
To start off, 2004 Alfa Romeo 166 is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Riley RM A would be higher. At 2,492 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Alfa Romeo 166 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Alfa Romeo 166 weights approximately 200 kg more than 1951 Riley RM A.
Because 1951 Riley RM A is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1951 Riley RM A. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Alfa Romeo 166, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1951 Riley RM A | 2004 Alfa Romeo 166 | |
Make | Riley | Alfa Romeo |
Model | RM A | 166 |
Year Released | 1951 | 2004 |
Engine Size | 1495 cc | 2492 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 185 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1235 kg | 1435 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 2710 mm |