1951 Riley RM A vs. 2007 Daewoo Tocsa
To start off, 2007 Daewoo Tocsa is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Riley RM A would be higher. At 1,991 cc (4 cylinders), 2007 Daewoo Tocsa is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1951 Riley RM A is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1951 Riley RM A. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Daewoo Tocsa, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1951 Riley RM A | 2007 Daewoo Tocsa | |
| Make | Riley | Daewoo |
| Model | RM A | Tocsa |
| Year Released | 1951 | 2007 |
| Engine Size | 1495 cc | 1991 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 148 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4805 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 2700 mm |
