1951 Riley RM A vs. 2009 Audi TT
To start off, 2009 Audi TT is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Riley RM A would be higher. At 1,984 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Audi TT is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Audi TT weights approximately 220 kg more than 1951 Riley RM A.
Because 2009 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1951 Riley RM A. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2009 Audi TT has automatic transmission and 1951 Riley RM A has manual transmission. 1951 Riley RM A will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Audi TT will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1951 Riley RM A | 2009 Audi TT | |
| Make | Riley | Audi |
| Model | RM A | TT |
| Year Released | 1951 | 2009 |
| Engine Size | 1495 cc | 1984 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 268 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1235 kg | 1455 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4200 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1850 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1360 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 2470 mm |
