1951 Riley RM A vs. 2010 Saturn Vue
To start off, 2010 Saturn Vue is newer by 59 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Riley RM A would be higher. At 2,401 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Saturn Vue is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1951 Riley RM A is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1951 Riley RM A. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Saturn Vue, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2010 Saturn Vue has automatic transmission and 1951 Riley RM A has manual transmission. 1951 Riley RM A will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Saturn Vue will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1951 Riley RM A | 2010 Saturn Vue | |
Make | Riley | Saturn |
Model | RM A | Vue |
Year Released | 1951 | 2010 |
Engine Size | 1495 cc | 2401 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 172 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4580 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 2710 mm |