1951 Riley RM A vs. 2011 Lotus Evora
To start off, 2011 Lotus Evora is newer by 60 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Riley RM A would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Lotus Evora is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1951 Riley RM A | 2011 Lotus Evora | |
Make | Riley | Lotus |
Model | RM A | Evora |
Year Released | 1951 | 2011 |
Engine Size | 1495 cc | 3500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 276 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4341 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1849 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1222 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 2576 mm |