1951 Riley RM A vs. 2011 Mercedes-Benz CL
To start off, 2011 Mercedes-Benz CL is newer by 60 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Riley RM A would be higher. At 4,663 cc (8 cylinders), 2011 Mercedes-Benz CL is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Mercedes-Benz CL weights approximately 985 kg more than 1951 Riley RM A.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2011 Mercedes-Benz CL has automatic transmission and 1951 Riley RM A has manual transmission. 1951 Riley RM A will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2011 Mercedes-Benz CL will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1951 Riley RM A | 2011 Mercedes-Benz CL | |
| Make | Riley | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | RM A | CL |
| Year Released | 1951 | 2011 |
| Engine Size | 1495 cc | 4663 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 432 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 5-speed shiftable automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1235 kg | 2220 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 5095 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1872 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1417 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 2954 mm |
