1951 Riley RM A vs. 2011 Volkswagen T5
To start off, 2011 Volkswagen T5 is newer by 60 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Riley RM A would be higher. At 2,459 cc (5 cylinders), 2011 Volkswagen T5 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Volkswagen T5 weights approximately 12 kg more than 1951 Riley RM A.
Because 1951 Riley RM A is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1951 Riley RM A. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Volkswagen T5, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1951 Riley RM A | 2011 Volkswagen T5 | |
Make | Riley | Volkswagen |
Model | RM A | T5 |
Year Released | 1951 | 2011 |
Engine Size | 1495 cc | 2459 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 129 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1235 kg | 1247 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 5300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1970 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1910 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 3410 mm |