1951 Riley RM A vs. 2011 Volvo XC60
To start off, 2011 Volvo XC60 is newer by 60 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Riley RM A would be higher. At 2,000 cc (5 cylinders), 2011 Volvo XC60 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Volvo XC60 weights approximately 686 kg more than 1951 Riley RM A.
Because 2011 Volvo XC60 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1951 Riley RM A. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Volvo XC60 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2011 Volvo XC60 has automatic transmission and 1951 Riley RM A has manual transmission. 1951 Riley RM A will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2011 Volvo XC60 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1951 Riley RM A | 2011 Volvo XC60 | |
| Make | Riley | Volvo |
| Model | RM A | XC60 |
| Year Released | 1951 | 2011 |
| Engine Size | 1495 cc | 2000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed shiftable automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1235 kg | 1921 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4628 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1890 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1712 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 2748 mm |
