1951 Riley RM A vs. 2012 Mini Cooper Coupe
To start off, 2012 Mini Cooper Coupe is newer by 61 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Riley RM A would be higher. At 1,600 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Mini Cooper Coupe is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1951 Riley RM A weights approximately 75 kg more than 2012 Mini Cooper Coupe.
Because 1951 Riley RM A is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1951 Riley RM A. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Mini Cooper Coupe, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1951 Riley RM A | 2012 Mini Cooper Coupe | |
Make | Riley | Mini |
Model | RM A | Cooper Coupe |
Year Released | 1951 | 2012 |
Engine Size | 1495 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 121 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1235 kg | 1160 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 3729 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1684 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1387 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 2466 mm |