1951 Riley RM A vs. 2012 Nissan Juke
To start off, 2012 Nissan Juke is newer by 61 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Riley RM A would be higher. At 1,600 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Nissan Juke is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Nissan Juke weights approximately 107 kg more than 1951 Riley RM A.
Because 1951 Riley RM A is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1951 Riley RM A. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Nissan Juke, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1951 Riley RM A | 2012 Nissan Juke | |
Make | Riley | Nissan |
Model | RM A | Juke |
Year Released | 1951 | 2012 |
Engine Size | 1495 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 188 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
Vehicle Weight | 1235 kg | 1342 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4125 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1765 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1570 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 2530 mm |