1951 Riley RM A vs. 2012 Toyota Highlander
To start off, 2012 Toyota Highlander is newer by 61 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Riley RM A would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Toyota Highlander is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Toyota Highlander weights approximately 925 kg more than 1951 Riley RM A.
Because 2012 Toyota Highlander is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1951 Riley RM A. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Toyota Highlander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1951 Riley RM A | 2012 Toyota Highlander | |
Make | Riley | Toyota |
Model | RM A | Highlander |
Year Released | 1951 | 2012 |
Engine Size | 1495 cc | 3500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 280 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
Vehicle Weight | 1235 kg | 2160 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4796 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1910 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 2789 mm |