1951 Riley RM A vs. 2013 Dodge DART
To start off, 2013 Dodge DART is newer by 62 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Riley RM A would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Dodge DART is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Dodge DART weights approximately 204 kg more than 1951 Riley RM A.
Because 1951 Riley RM A is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1951 Riley RM A. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Dodge DART, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1951 Riley RM A | 2013 Dodge DART | |
Make | Riley | Dodge |
Model | RM A | DART |
Year Released | 1951 | 2013 |
Engine Size | 1495 cc | 1999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 158 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1235 kg | 1439 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4672 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1465 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 2703 mm |