1951 Riley RM A vs. 2013 GMC Sierra
To start off, 2013 GMC Sierra is newer by 62 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Riley RM A would be higher. At 4,800 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 GMC Sierra is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 GMC Sierra weights approximately 788 kg more than 1951 Riley RM A.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2013 GMC Sierra has automatic transmission and 1951 Riley RM A has manual transmission. 1951 Riley RM A will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 GMC Sierra will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1951 Riley RM A | 2013 GMC Sierra | |
| Make | Riley | GMC |
| Model | RM A | Sierra |
| Year Released | 1951 | 2013 |
| Engine Size | 1495 cc | 4800 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 298 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 4-speed automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1235 kg | 2023 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 5222 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 2031 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1869 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 3023 mm |
