1951 Riley RM A vs. 2013 Mini Countryman
To start off, 2013 Mini Countryman is newer by 62 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Riley RM A would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Mini Countryman weights approximately 245 kg more than 1951 Riley RM A.
Because 2013 Mini Countryman is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1951 Riley RM A. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Mini Countryman will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1951 Riley RM A | 2013 Mini Countryman | |
| Make | Riley | Mini |
| Model | RM A | Countryman |
| Year Released | 1951 | 2013 |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1235 kg | 1480 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4133 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1996 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1549 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 2595 mm |
