1951 Riley RM A vs. 2013 Volvo XC60
To start off, 2013 Volvo XC60 is newer by 62 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Riley RM A would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Volvo XC60 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Volvo XC60 weights approximately 683 kg more than 1951 Riley RM A.
Because 2013 Volvo XC60 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1951 Riley RM A. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Volvo XC60 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1951 Riley RM A | 2013 Volvo XC60 | |
Make | Riley | Volvo |
Model | RM A | XC60 |
Year Released | 1951 | 2013 |
Engine Size | 1495 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 6 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 296 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1235 kg | 1918 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4627 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1891 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1713 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 2774 mm |