1951 Rolls-Royce Phantom vs. 2009 Toyota 4Runner
To start off, 2009 Toyota 4Runner is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Rolls-Royce Phantom. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Rolls-Royce Phantom would be higher.
Because 2009 Toyota 4Runner is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1951 Rolls-Royce Phantom. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Toyota 4Runner will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1951 Rolls-Royce Phantom | 2009 Toyota 4Runner | |
Make | Rolls-Royce | Toyota |
Model | Phantom | 4Runner |
Year Released | 1951 | 2009 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 261 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 1920 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3690 mm | 2800 mm |