1951 Rover P4 vs. 2002 Acura CL
To start off, 2002 Acura CL is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Rover P4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Rover P4 would be higher. At 3,210 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Acura CL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Acura CL (260 HP @ 6900 RPM) has 185 more horse power than 1951 Rover P4. (75 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Acura CL should accelerate faster than 1951 Rover P4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Acura CL weights approximately 190 kg more than 1951 Rover P4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1951 Rover P4 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1951 Rover P4. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Acura CL, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Acura CL (315 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 165 more torque (in Nm) than 1951 Rover P4. (150 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2002 Acura CL will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1951 Rover P4.
Compare all specifications:
1951 Rover P4 | 2002 Acura CL | |
Make | Rover | Acura |
Model | P4 | CL |
Year Released | 1951 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2103 cc | 3210 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 75 HP | 260 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 6900 RPM |
Torque | 150 Nm | 315 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 65.2 mm | 89 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 105 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 7.3:1 | 9.8:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1390 kg | 1580 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 4880 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1620 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2580 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 52 L | 65 L |