1951 Saab 92 vs. 1969 Zastava 1500
To start off, 1969 Zastava 1500 is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Saab 92. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Saab 92 would be higher. At 1,294 cc (4 cylinders), 1969 Zastava 1500 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Zastava 1500 (53 HP) has 29 more horse power than 1951 Saab 92. (24 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1969 Zastava 1500 should accelerate faster than 1951 Saab 92. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Zastava 1500 weights approximately 175 kg more than 1951 Saab 92. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1969 Zastava 1500 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Zastava 1500. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1951 Saab 92, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1951 Saab 92 | 1969 Zastava 1500 | |
Make | Saab | Zastava |
Model | 92 | 1500 |
Year Released | 1951 | 1969 |
Engine Size | 764 cc | 1294 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 24 HP | 53 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 805 kg | 980 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3960 mm | 4040 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2430 mm |