1951 Saab 92 vs. 2006 Seat Alhambra
To start off, 2006 Seat Alhambra is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Saab 92. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Saab 92 would be higher. At 2,792 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Seat Alhambra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Seat Alhambra (201 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 177 more horse power than 1951 Saab 92. (24 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Seat Alhambra should accelerate faster than 1951 Saab 92. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Seat Alhambra weights approximately 895 kg more than 1951 Saab 92. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1951 Saab 92 | 2006 Seat Alhambra | |
| Make | Saab | Seat |
| Model | 92 | Alhambra |
| Year Released | 1951 | 2006 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Minivan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 764 cc | 2792 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 24 HP | 201 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 805 kg | 1700 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3960 mm | 4640 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1820 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1710 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2850 mm |
