1951 Singer SM 1500 vs. 2008 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2008 Ford Ecosport is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Singer SM 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Singer SM 1500 would be higher. At 1,600 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Ford Ecosport is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Ford Ecosport (109 HP) has 62 more horse power than 1951 Singer SM 1500. (47 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Ford Ecosport should accelerate faster than 1951 Singer SM 1500.
Because 1951 Singer SM 1500 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1951 Singer SM 1500. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Ford Ecosport, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1951 Singer SM 1500 | 2008 Ford Ecosport | |
| Make | Singer | Ford |
| Model | SM 1500 | Ecosport |
| Year Released | 1951 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1495 cc | 1600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 47 HP | 109 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4228 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 1980 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1240 mm | 1679 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2320 mm | 2490 mm |
