1951 Singer SM 1500 vs. 2012 Peugeot 508
To start off, 2012 Peugeot 508 is newer by 61 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Singer SM 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Singer SM 1500 would be higher. At 1,600 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Peugeot 508 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Peugeot 508 (110 HP) has 63 more horse power than 1951 Singer SM 1500. (47 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Peugeot 508 should accelerate faster than 1951 Singer SM 1500.
Because 1951 Singer SM 1500 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1951 Singer SM 1500. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Peugeot 508, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1951 Singer SM 1500 | 2012 Peugeot 508 | |
Make | Singer | Peugeot |
Model | SM 1500 | 508 |
Year Released | 1951 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1495 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 47 HP | 110 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4792 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 1853 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1240 mm | 1456 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2320 mm | 2817 mm |