1951 Talbot Baby vs. 1964 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1964 Triumph 2000 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Talbot Baby. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Talbot Baby would be higher. At 2,690 cc (4 cylinders), 1951 Talbot Baby is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1951 Talbot Baby (108 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 19 more horse power than 1964 Triumph 2000. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1951 Talbot Baby should accelerate faster than 1964 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1951 Talbot Baby weights approximately 480 kg more than 1964 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1951 Talbot Baby | 1964 Triumph 2000 | |
| Make | Talbot | Triumph |
| Model | Baby | 2000 |
| Year Released | 1951 | 1964 |
| Engine Size | 2690 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 108 HP | 89 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1650 kg | 1170 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5060 mm | 4420 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3130 mm | 2700 mm |
