1951 Talbot Baby vs. 2010 Chevrolet Camaro
To start off, 2010 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 59 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Talbot Baby. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Talbot Baby would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Chevrolet Camaro (426 HP @ 5900 RPM) has 318 more horse power than 1951 Talbot Baby. (108 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1951 Talbot Baby. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 101 kg more than 1951 Talbot Baby. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1951 Talbot Baby | 2010 Chevrolet Camaro | |
| Make | Talbot | Chevrolet |
| Model | Baby | Camaro |
| Year Released | 1951 | 2010 |
| Engine Size | 2690 cc | 6200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 108 HP | 426 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5900 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1650 kg | 1751 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5060 mm | 4836 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1918 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1377 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3130 mm | 2852 mm |
