1951 Talbot Baby vs. 2013 Hyundai Elantra
To start off, 2013 Hyundai Elantra is newer by 62 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Talbot Baby. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Talbot Baby would be higher. At 2,690 cc (4 cylinders), 1951 Talbot Baby is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Hyundai Elantra (146 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 38 more horse power than 1951 Talbot Baby. (108 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Hyundai Elantra should accelerate faster than 1951 Talbot Baby. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1951 Talbot Baby weights approximately 345 kg more than 2013 Hyundai Elantra.
Because 1951 Talbot Baby is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1951 Talbot Baby. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Hyundai Elantra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1951 Talbot Baby | 2013 Hyundai Elantra | |
| Make | Talbot | Hyundai |
| Model | Baby | Elantra |
| Year Released | 1951 | 2013 |
| Engine Size | 2690 cc | 1797 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 108 HP | 146 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1650 kg | 1305 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5060 mm | 4540 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1775 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1435 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3130 mm | 2750 mm |
