1951 Toyota SA vs. 1980 Mitsubishi Sigma
To start off, 1980 Mitsubishi Sigma is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Toyota SA. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Toyota SA would be higher. At 1,995 cc (4 cylinders), 1980 Mitsubishi Sigma is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Mitsubishi Sigma (86 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 59 more horse power than 1951 Toyota SA. (27 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1980 Mitsubishi Sigma should accelerate faster than 1951 Toyota SA. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1951 Toyota SA weights approximately 140 kg more than 1980 Mitsubishi Sigma.
Compare all specifications:
| 1951 Toyota SA | 1980 Mitsubishi Sigma | |
| Make | Toyota | Mitsubishi |
| Model | SA | Sigma |
| Year Released | 1951 | 1980 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 995 cc | 1995 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 27 HP | 86 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1170 kg | 1030 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3810 mm | 4460 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2520 mm |
